
I'm guilty of it. You're probably guilty of it, you know, it usually goes something like this "I listen to hip-hop, not rap." The distinction between hip-hop and rap is one that "heads" have been making for years. While there are number of nuanced arguments about Hip-Hop as a culture,
the hip-hop versus rap dichotomy is outdated and useless.So the gist of the argument is usually any commercial rap music is classified as "rap" and anything that may be underground or semi-authentic is "hip-hop." The water usually gets murky when you ask about folks who have cross over appeal, but ya'll know what I mean. I recently realized, I can no longer do this bullshit distinction between hip-hop and rap. First let me make it clear, I'm not saying that I can't tell some difference between the two. This doesn't mean that I don't watch 106 and Park with a pain in my stomach. None of that changes, but my decision is one that is much like many disgruntled married couples, I can't split (hip hop from rap)... because of the children.
When I first started spewing the distinction it was in cinder block dorm rooms, but now that I hear the argument I hear it on TV, on websites, in blogs. As someone who considers himself somewhat of a scholar of Hip-Hop, I can appreciate a theoretical distinction. But I'm trying to look at it from the bottom up, not top down. I really started thinking about this distinction when I was reading
blac(k)ademic's post on
NYOil's video "Ya'll should all get lynched".
3 comments:
Mmmmmm, Weeeeell now (That's all I have to say)
I agree. Remember a while back when I began my series on HIP-HOP? What happened to me finishing that series? I'll tell you one thing - it was harder than I thought it would be. The lines between the two are not so clear in 2006. There is a lot of cross over - back and forth. The truth is - unless you sell records - you cannot be heard.
dropping ill rhymes on geopolitics and the failures of neoliberalism to some kids with trust funds in schenectady is what it's all about!
okay, seriously...i think it's even somewhat simpler than that. hip hop started off as culture/art. at some point, it became very marketable. when it transformed from art to business (it's still art, don't get me wrong), the incentives changed. dropping gems at ciphers about how drugs were destroying the inner city was definitey keeping it real, but it won't sell. well, not as much as joints about 21's spinning. and while i truly do not enjoy hearing bullshit rap, i also understand that in any business, it is about making a profit. so, i can't completely hate on guys like jigga and diddy. i just don't dig them. whatsoever.
once hip hop crossed over into a marketable business, it was going to change. record labels aren't trying to promo kweli, the mighty mos, or dead prez anywhere near the level they will for 50 or jay-z because they are too intricate and complex for mainstream suburban america to feel completely. the simpler/stupider/more outlandishly silly the message is, the more units it will probably move. so, really, the thing about hip hop that changed is the money. if there is a way for more non-bullshit hip hop to sell on the level of its more bullshitty version, it'll move back to its roots. at which point, i'm sure the government will just ban the music altogether.
Post a Comment